MACEDONIA COMMENTARY SAYS KOSOVO BORDER
DEMARCATION REQUEST DANGEROUS
BBC Monitoring International Reports - February 2, 2005
Text of commentary by Slobodan Casule: "Instead of offering standards, Rugova
seeking borders" by Macedonian newspaper Dnevnik on 29 January
(Kosovo President) Ibrahim Rugova's refusal to recognize the border of the
Kosovo protectorate with the Republic of Macedonia is dangerous. He insists on
Kosovo being included in negotiations on the border between Serbia-Montenegro
and Macedonia, although Kosovo is still a Serbian province, at least until its
status is resolved and while UN Resolution 1244 remains valid. His insistence is
not based on rights or facts, let alone on international legal logic. He is
plotting with his dangerous aspirations. The rejection of the border also means
the rejection of the recognized and verified international document on the
demarcation of the border between the Republic of Macedonia and the Republic of
Serbia. They have delimited and acknowledged their borders, so they are now
definitive and recognized throughout the world.
Throughout the history of international relations there has never been a case of
initiating talks to revise the borders of the original state on the basis of a
unilateral request for by entity that has still not seceded from the original
state. This is like a partition, or a prerequisite for it, which has not ended
with a war.
When I was foreign minister, I submitted to the United Nations the maps and the
instruments for the delimitation of the border between the Republic of Macedonia
and the SR (Federal Republic) of Yugoslavia; that is, the Republic of Serbia. At
a plenary session of the UN Security Council I warned that the rejection of this
border would cause a state of chaos in the Balkans and Europe. The United
States, Russia, China, France, the UK and the other non-permanent members of the
Security Council supported me. Therefore, bearing in mind this authority, I
would like to underline several consequences that our country should tackle.
Namely, the foundations of our current European stability and prosperity are the
Helsinki documents adopted at the Conference on European Security and
Cooperation. They reject any unilateral change of borders, especially if this is
accompanied by force and pressure. If we review Ibrahim Rugova's statement that
he opposes the border demarcation, it is very clear that he openly undermines
the European architecture by making the revision of borders legal, as a new
annexed OSCE principle that would guarantee regional security. His argument that
he is "seeking justice" with some delay is not valid.
On the contrary, this is actually an attempt to create the preconditions for
Kosovo's independence, based on the general revision of all Balkan borders,
through a political statement. This is quite unacceptable, because it will
certainly have catastrophic influence on the stability of the region and its
prosperity. This means that this is not an empty and conjunctive whistling in
the wind, but a deliberately expressed political will occurring right before the
negotiations on Kosovo's status are put on the agenda in the middle of the year.
Otherwise, how can we interpret a whole series of events that marked the
beginning of the resolution of Kosovo's status?
First and foremost, there was the tension on the border with Serbia. This
culminated with the death of a child, who was shot by a Serbian border patrol
when he tried to enter Serbia illegally from Kosovo through the Valley of
Presevo, Medvedja and Bujanovac (southern Serbia). Then there followed the
protests, which, as always, used the murder of an innocent child to stress the
"unjust" borders that "fence the Albanians' areas". They once again used the
opportunity to codify the Albanians' territories from the Adriatic Sea and the
Albanian Province of Tropoj, all the way to Bulgaria, including Kosovo and the
Valley of Presevo, Medvedja and Bujanovac. Almost at the same time, the
Lipkovo-Kumanovo branch fiercely reminded the DUI (Democratic Union for
Integration - BDI in Albanian) leadership that it had not kept any of the
promises that were the excuses for the 2001 war. Moreover, they have also not
been compensated for the price that this region had to pay during the war in
order to change the government and delimit the Albanians' territory beyond
western Macedonia.
It is not accidental that the 2001 armed conflict was most vehemently waged
precisely in this area. Hence, it is comprehensible why the ruling coalition is
worried that the political stability there is once again being undermined.
Namely, the self-proclaimed "Albanian corridor" runs along the border between
Macedonia and Serbia, near Ljuboten, Aracinovo, Lipkovo, Tanusevci and so on. It
begins at the Adriatic Sea and ends in Bulgaria, south of "the borders that
fence the Albanians' region".
Both conflicts were being waged according to the same scheme of delimiting the
area of which Albanians have been unjustly deprived by blood. Their statements
were focused on the "righteous fight for the realization of human rights,
annulling the apartheid (which did not exist), and eradicating poverty,
organized crime, and corruption". However, their objective was apparently
territorial. (BDI) Assembly deputy Hysni Shaqiri's testimony in the Assembly was
obvious proof that organized crime has not been fully eradicated and that there
is a high level of corruption. This can be used in order to understand the
economic apartheid that has been created now, three years after the "righteous
war". Shaqiri's statements have revealed the "major national and historical
goals"; that is, that Albanians should provide territory to their elite through
war, hunger and despair. They will then live on this territory all alone, in
misery and fear, as hostages of armed bandits and tribal leaders, and as slaves
of organized crime and corruption.
Kosovo President Rugova has completed these vital goals by asking that the
Kosovo part of the border between Macedonia and Serbia be revised. Thus, he
legitimized the infuriated mob's outbursts in a precise way and presented them
as permanent and mandatory in political terms. In his view, all the Kosovo
borders are contentious, so they should be reviewed during the negotiations on
its status. The Macedonian and Serbian borders are essential here, because they
are in the middle of the Albanian territory. The border with Albania will be
altered in everyday life. On the other hand, the border with Serbia on the part
with Metohija will be the motive for the revision and an award for the "obedient
Serbs" who will accept the province's division.
Source: Dnevnik, Skopje, in Macedonian 29 Jan 05
p 17
Copyright 2005 Financial Times Information
All rights reserved
Global News Wire - Asia Africa Intelligence Wire
Copyright 2005 BBC Monitoring/BBC
Posted for Fair Use only.