CROATIAN FASCISM CAUSED SERBIAN UNREST IN LATE
80s AND EARLY 90s
www.slobodan-milosevic.org – February 15,
2006
Written by: Andy Wilcoxson
Montenegro’s former representative in the SFRY state presidency, Prof. Branko
Kostic, concluded his testimony at the trial of Slobodan Milosevic on Wednesday.
Prof. Kostic reiterated his testimony that Slobodan Milosevic had no control
over Milan Babic or the Krajina-Serb leadership. He said that Milosevic only had
political influence.
He also testified that Milosevic played no role in JNA activities, and that the
JNA was commanded by the SFRY state presidency. To bear this point out he
recounted an instance when the SFRY presidency took a decision to pension off a
number of JNA generals. One of the generals that they pensioned off was Serbia’s
Minister of Defense. Kostic recalled that Milosevic called him to ask how come
he had not been notified in advance that his defense minister was to be
pensioned off.
During the re-examination Kostic cleared up some matters in relation to a speech
that he made in Borovo Selo in 1991. The prosecution accused him of using the
speech to whip people up into a warlike frenzy. When Kostic was permitted to
quote the actual text of the speech it emerged that the speech was aimed at
reassuring the Croatian and Serbian population that the JNA would protect them.
Kostic also testified that the JNA did not destroy Dubrovnik. He said that the
JNA was ordered not to fire on the old town, and that they did not fire on the
old town. He said that Croatia staged phony attacks against the old town and
used it as a firing point.
After Kostic withdrew, Prof. Dr. Marko Atlagic took the witness stand. Atlagic
was a deputy in the Croatian Sabor from 1990 to 1992 representing the Benkovac
area.
Prof. Atlagic testified that Slobodan Milosevic was not masterminding a joint
criminal enterprise against Croatia. According to Atlagic, Franjo Tudjman was
pursuing a joint criminal enterprise to destroy Yugoslavia, expel the Serbian
population, and conquer parts of Bosnia, Serbia, and Montenegro.
To prove his thesis that Tudjman was the mastermind of a joint criminal
enterprise, Atlagic quoted from the platform adopted at the first party congress
of Tudjman’s political party the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ). The party
platform advocated a Greater-Croatian state, and a return to the borders of the
WWII-era Independent State of Croatia (NDH), which was governed by pro-Nazi
fascists, called “Ustashas”.
Atlagic testified that Tudjman had advocated a greater-Croatian ideology for
quite some time. He read from a book that Tudjman wrote in 1964. In that book
Tudjman advocated the destruction of Yugoslavia and a return to the borders of
the NDH. This book ultimately landed Tudjman in jail when he wrote it.
The witness testified that fascist provocations began to resurface in Croatia as
early as 1989. He recalled incidents where drunken gangs of Croats roamed the
streets calling the names of Ante Starcevic and Ante Pavelic and saying that
“Serbs would be hung from the willow trees” once Croatia got its independence.
He said that these incidents were met with no reaction from the Croatian
authorities.
Ante Starcevic is a well-known Croatian historical figure who opposed
Yugoslavia. In 1870 he wrote that Serbs were “filthy spawn, horrible slaves,
people only fit for the axe.”
Ante Starcevic founded the Croatian Party of Rights (HSP) in 1861. The HSP
established an armed terrorist faction that later became the Ustasha. The
Ustasha came to power in Croatia in 1941 when the Nazis occupied Yugoslavia and
established the Independent State of Croatia (NDH).
In spite of his fascist ideology, Starcevic is widely revered in Croatia. The
Croats call him “the father of the Croatian nation”, and the Croatian government
prints his picture on the 1,000 Kuna bank note to this very day.
Ante Pavelic was the leader, or poglavnik, of the Ustasha/NDH during
World War II. Pavelic is seen in
this
picture meeting with Adolf Hitler:
Prof. Atlagic testified that in the late 80s and early 90s the Croatian police
did not do any thing to stop fascist provocations. He said that the Croatian
authorities even joined in.
Atlagic testified that in Zagreb a monument to the victims of fascism was torn
down and replaced with a monument to Mile Budak. Budak was the Ustasha’s
education minister who drafted the so-called “Law on Protection of People's and
Aryan Culture of Croatian People”, which banned Jews from holding public office
in Croatia.
On July 22, 1941, Budak gave a speech that defined the Ustasha strategy. He
said, "We shall kill one part of the Serbs. We shall transport another third,
and the rest of them will embrace the Roman Catholic religion... Our new Croatia
will become Catholic within ten years."
The witness recalled that at one point Croatia banned Serbs from placing
memorial wreaths on the site of the Jasenovac concentration camp.
In addition to the destruction and removal of anti-fascist monuments, Atlagic
recalled several chilling statements made by Franjo Tudjman.
In 1989, while attending a conference of the German diplomatic corps, Tudjman
proclaimed that Krajina would be “red with blood” once he became Croatia’s
president.
The witness also recounted Tudjman’s infamous statement where he said, “thank
God my wife is neither a Serb nor a Jew.”
Prof. Atlagic presented the court with the text of a 1997 statement that Tudjman
gave to the Croatian Sabor where he said that his greatest achievement as
Croatia’s president had been the ethnic cleansing of the Serbs. The witness
connected this to a statement that Tudjman made in 1990 where he said that
250,000 Serbs should leave Croatia.
In addition to hostile statements from the Croatian leadership, Serbs in Croatia
were purged from schools and the police. Croatia even went so far as to rename
the Serbo-Croatian language the Croatian language.
No fascist government would be complete without violence against “undesirable”
minorities and Tudjman’s government was no exception.
Prof. Atlagic said that between 1990 and 1992, Tudjman’s government burned over
4,000 Serbian homes in Western Slavonia.
In March of 1991 Croatian fascists rampaged through the town of Zadar destroying
350 Serb-owned shops and homes in one night.
The witness also testified that Croatian fascists destroyed more than 160
Serbian Orthodox churches.
Even Croatian politicians who are called “moderates” made inflammatory
statements. Atlagic testified that on March 2, 1990 Stjepan Mesic told a rally
in Gospic “When we Croats establish our own state, all the Serbs in it will fit
under a single umbrella.” Stjepan Mesic is currently Croatia’s president, and he
testified as a prosecution witness earlier in the trial. He is also a convicted
criminal having spent time in prison during the 1970s.
All of this evidence goes to show that the Krajina-Serbs were forced to go to
war to defend themselves against a fascist Croatian state that made no secret
that it was plotting their extermination. This runs completely contrary to the
prosecution’s case that Milosevic was responsible for the war.
During Prof. Atlagic’s testimony, the judges and the prosecution both made
frequent interventions to try and get Milosevic to focus his questions on the
specific incidents alleged by the indictment.
Focusing on the specific incidents alleged by the indictments would be the
dumbest strategy Milosevic could adopt. The only thing that links him to any of
what’s alleged in the Croatian and Bosnian indictments is the prosecution’s
assertion that he masterminded a gigantic conspiracy that was aimed at achieving
an objective that the prosecution has left undefined. The prosecution used to
say that the objective of the conspiracy was the establishment of “greater
Serbia,” but they’ve dropped that thesis and replaced it with nothing.
By showing that war broke-out as the result of violent Muslim and Croat
provocations, and by showing that no Serbian conspiracy existed, Milosevic
completely negates the thesis put forward by the indictments thus rendering the
specific incidents alleged in them irrelevant.
Milosevic will certainly focus his attention on some specific incidents in order
to defend the Serbian people and establish the truth about certain events, but
he does not have to do that in order to prove his own innocence, because there’s
just no link between him and the alleged crimes.
Prof. Atlagic will continue his testimony when the trial resumes on Wednesday,
February 22nd.
# # #