MR. NICE ATTRIBUTES A FALSE WITNESS STATEMENT
TO RADE MARKOVIC IN A FAILED BID TO CONFUSE THE TESTIMONY OF GEN. FARKAS
www.slobodan-milosevic.org – November 10, 2005
Written by: Andy Wilcoxson
General Geza Farkas, the former chief of the Security Dept. of the Yugoslav
Army, completed his testimony at the trial of Slobodan Milosevic on Thursday.
Mr. Nice spent nearly the entire day cross-examining the witness. The prosecutor
continued to question the witness about the alleged re-burial of corpses at
Batajnica.
Mr. Nice claims that the prosecution has a statement from Serbia’s former state
security chief, Radomir Markovic, in which he says that Vlastimir Djordjevic
asks that Albanian corpses to be taken from Kosovo to eliminate evidence of
civilian casualties that could be investigated by The Hague Tribunal. In this
alleged statement, Milosevic is accused of instructing Vlajko Stojiljkovic to
take measures to remove the corpses of Albanian civilians from Kosovo.
What Mr. Nice failed to mention was the suspicious origin of this statement. The
statement that Mr. Nice relied on today was allegedly taken by prosecution
witness Zoran Stijovic on June 1, 2002.
Mr. Stijovic testified at the Hague Tribunal on September 5, 2002, and during
the cross-examination Milosevic asked him if pressure had been exerted on
Markovic in order to make him give this false statement. To which Stijovic gave
the carefully worded response, “I claim that I did not exert any pressure on
him. Whether any pressure was exerted on him or not I cannot say.”
Mr. Stijovic went on to admit that Markovic had been held in solitary
confinement, and that the statement was not given in the presence of an
attorney.
In addition to the illegal circumstances it was allegedly taken under, there are
serious doubts about the authenticity of the alleged statement itself. Ms.
Olivera Antonic-Simic, the secretary who is supposed to have recorded the
alleged statement refused to confirm the authenticity of the document that Mr.
Nice was claiming today is Markovic’s statement.
When Markovic testified at the Hague Tribunal he said exactly the opposite of
what Mr. Nice attributed to him today:
On July 26, 2002 Milosevic and Markovic had the following exchanges:
MILOSEVIC: Did anyone at that meeting mention that clean-up also involves
removal of traces of crimes or any sort of cover-up? Did anyone say that crimes
needed to be covered up?
MARKOVIC: No, nobody talked about crimes or covering them up.
MILOSEVIC: And even later, in the Ministry of the Interior, did anyone speak
about the need to transfer some bodies from Kosovo to Serbia proper?
MARKOVIC: Not that I heard.
[…]
MILOSEVIC: Here, when you talked to two committees of the parliament of
Yugoslavia, you say: "They asked me to accuse Slobodan Milosevic and to admit to
criminal acts and to say that I was instructed by Slobodan Milosevic thereof."
Is that correct?
MARKOVIC: That's correct. I was told that in that case I would not be the one
who would be held accountable but that I could choose a country where I would
live and that I could get a new identity and that it was indispensable to accuse
you so that you would be tried in the country.
/// END EXCERPT///
Mr. Nice is keenly aware of the highly dubious nature of Markovic’s alleged
statement, but in court today he stubbornly insisted on its truthfulness and
accuracy. Mr. Nice even went so far as to accuse Gen. Farkas of lying when he
testified that the army did not undertake any operations to hide corpses during
the war.
Gen. Farkas was at exactly the same meeting where Markovic’s alleged statement
says that Milosevic ordered Stojiljkovic to remove the corpses of Albanian
civilians from Kosovo. Gen. Farkas said in very clear terms that no such orders
were ever issued at that meeting, or any other meeting that he knew of.
Mr. Nice questioned Gen. Farkas about the role of the Joint Command and the
Supreme Command Staff. The prosecution claims that the Supreme Command Staff and
the Joint Command were bodies that Milosevic established in order to illegally
seize control of the Army and police; the witness flatly rejected this thesis.
Gen. Farkas explained that the Joint Command was a body that was set-up to
facilitate cooperation between the Army and the police. It did not factor
anywhere in the military chain of command. He said that the Supreme Command was
the same thing as the General Staff. According to the law on defense, when a
state of war is proclaimed the General Staff becomes the Supreme Command.
At one point Mr. Nice alleged that the Army of Yugoslavia discriminated against
non-Serbs. It is somewhat ironic that Mr. Nice would put that proposition to
this particular witness, because Gen. Farkas is an ethnic Hungarian from
Vojovodina – he is a non-Serb. He denied that non-Serbs were discriminated
against, and said that racism and ethnic hatred were rare in the ranks of the
army.
Mr. Nice wasted a great deal of time asking the witness questions about the
activities of the police and the activities of civilian institutions. The
witness had to remind the prosecutor that he was in the Army, and that the
activities of the police and the civilian judiciary were not within his purview.
Mr. Nice frequently criticized Gen. Farkas for not having notes and documents to
substantiate certain portions of his testimony. Normally this type of criticism
would be acceptable, but Gen. Farkas’s office was bombed by NATO and his
documents were blown to smithereens. If Mr. Nice has a problem with missing
documentation then he should complain to NATO, and stop harassing the witness.
Gen. Farkas concluded his testimony after a brief re-examination by Milosevic.
Milosevic will start with a fresh witness when the trial resumes tomorrow.
# # #