Russia's Principled Stand on Kosovo
The Washington Post - November 25, 2006 Saturday
Right now the United States and Russia need to deepen their cooperation on such
top-tier issues as North Korea, Iran and the Middle East. In this context, The
Post's suggested "in your face" approach to Russia's role in finding an
equitable and stable solution to the festering problem of Kosovo is both
surprising and troubling ["Here Comes Kosovo," editorial, Nov. 10].
It is ironic that The Post accuses the Putin administration of a policy based on
threats and violence, when it is in fact precisely threats and violence that
underlie the demand for Kosovo independence. (Or as it is euphemistically
phrased in the editorial, "Putting off Kosovo's independence would only enrage
the province's 2 million Albanians and trigger the Balkan meltdown that the West
hopes to avoid.") It is just that kind of violent rage that has driven from
Kosovo two-thirds of the province's pre-war Serbian population (and many people
in other ethnic groups) and destroyed some 150 Orthodox Christian churches and
monasteries. Rewarding such behavior with an imposed solution would only
encourage more of the same and lead to a meltdown all parties hope to avoid.
The Russian government properly insists that the future of Kosovo can only be
decided through negotiation and adopted in a manner consistent with the U.N.
Charter and the Helsinki Final Act.
This is not a cynical ploy, as The Post supposes, but the principled position of
a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council.
American voters sent their government a strong message regarding the
consequences of actions undertaken in violation of norms of international
behavior. I trust that message was not limited to Iraq.
SERGEI N. SHISHKAREV
Deputy Chairman
Committee on Energy, Transportation and Communications
Russian State Duma
Moscow
Copyright 2006 The Washington Post
Posted for Fair Use only.