Balkan realities
The Washington Times - July 20, 2006, Thursday [SECTION: LETTERS; Pg. A18 ]
Tod Lindberg is right that the EU and NATO countries should not turn their backs
on Balkan countries wishing to share in the peace and prosperity of the new
Europe. However, he is wrong to suggest that it was only Slobodan Milosevic's
"genocidal policies" that set the Balkans in flames in the early 1990s and wrong
to condemn Serbian determination to maintain Kosovo as an integral part of its
territory ("Where Milosevic's butchery held sway," Op-Ed, July 11).
It has become fashionable to blame Milosevic and Serbia for everything that went
wrong in the former Yugoslavia while overlooking the concerns of the Christian
Serbian population in Bosnia and in Kosovo at the grim prospects of having to
live in Muslim-dominated states.
Alia Izetbegovic, the Muslim Bosnian leader, was an Islamist extremist who made
no attempt to hide his plans for destroying the Christian entity in Bosnia,
writing, "There can be no peace or co-existence between the Islamist faith and
non-Islamist institutions." As for Agim Ceku, the so-called prime minister of
Kosovo, the Canadian military knows what crimes he is guilty of even if the
Hague Tribunal refused to indict him.
In 1993, Mr. Ceku commanded Croatian forces that violated a U.N.-brokered
cease-fire and overran three Serbian villages in the Medac pocket. When the
Canadians counterattacked and re-entered the burned villages, they discovered
all of the inhabitants and domestic animals had been slaughtered. Mr. Ceku later
also ordered undefended Serbian villages shelled in violation of the rules of
war, causing heavy casualties among the civilian population.
In 2002, Mr. Ceku was indicted by Serbia for responsibility as a Kosovo
Liberation Army commander for the murders of 669 Serbians and other
non-Albanians during the fighting that broke out in Kosovo in 1998. The
indictment includes murder, abduction, torture and ethnic cleansing of the
non-Albanian population from Kosovo. This is the man recently invited to
Washington to meet with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, a meeting obviously
planned to show U.S. support for Kosovo independence.
For many outside observers, including this writer, the continued support by the
United States for an independent Kosovo is incomprehensible. Granting
independence to Kosovo would be a serious violation of Serbia's territorial
integrity, which is one of the most cherished principles of international law
and is enshrined in the United Nations Charter. U.S. violation of this principle
would have far-reaching implications for the very framework of international
peace and security.
Independence for Kosovo also would create a criminal and terrorist state in the
heart of the Balkans. This is not a happy prospect in today's world.
Kosovo independence would set a precedent for other aspiring ethnic groups for
independent status and would destabilize not only the Balkans, but many other
parts of the world. It also would mark a low point in U.S. foreign policy. It is
difficult to be held up as the champion of the rule of law, of democracy and the
global war on terror, while at the same time giving support to war criminals and
terrorists.
JAMES BISSETT
Former Canadian ambassador to the former Yugoslavia
Ottawa
Copyright 2006 News
World Communications, Inc.
Posted for Fair Use only.